Review: Meta services by Kani Baspinar (Sharingtools.services)

In short

Kani Baspinar sells paid Meta services through Sharingtools.services and his Telegram channel. On 23 August 2026 I ordered one of them for a client, an Instagram account unban. He sold it as the work of a personal trusted contact at Meta: asked “Is this your personal trusted friend in Meta?”, he answered “Personal trusted contact after cease and desist letter and ban on my business and personal accounts”, with whitelist included, a “100% guarantee”, “refund guaranteed” and clearing of the strikes on posts. I paid $1,250 (USDT TRC20).

The account came back on the evening of 25 August and was suspended again the same night. On 27 August, after the appeal that Kani himself asked us to file (“Appeal it, it will open directly”), Meta disabled it permanently. The whitelist protected nothing, the strikes were never cleared, the second unban was postponed several times and never delivered. On 3 September Kani stopped the work, and on 7 September he refused both to finish it and to return the money.

In my experience of this market, Meta unblocking services carry a guarantee of at least a month: if the account is banned again right away, it is restored again. Here the account was banned within hours, the guarantee had been promised in writing (“Refund guaranteed service it is.”, “It is lifetime warranty”), and when I invoked it the second unban and the whitelist were reclassified as gifts: “Second unban was gift”, “whiltelist for mass report was gift”. With every problem the client turned out to be at fault: VPN, “bad IP”, “got banned themselves”, “fake identity”, “didn't inform us about the screen change”, “you are insulting”. The reasons, and the process itself, were invented as the work went along.

Below are cutouts from the Telegram conversation in chronological order: white messages on the left are Kani's, green ones on the right are mine. The client's personal data (account, email) is blacked out.

He set every price and every term himself, then said I wanted it cheap

What he proposed himself on 23 August:

• 13:35, asked “How much?”: “2000 usd”.
• 13:41, asked whether protection with a monthly fee existed: “We can unblock and whitelist also”, “Whitelisting included to unblock”, “So no need monthly fee”. He is the one who put the whitelist inside the price.
• 14:23, without any request for a discount: “I can even do it for you 1500 for multi orders in week”.
• 17:24, when I only asked him to confirm the terms: “Refund guaranteed service it is”, “%100 guarantee for unban in 3-7 days max”, “It is lifetime warranty”.
• 17:42, again unasked: “Let me make you discount for first order, we can do it for you from 1250 usd”. My reply was that the drop looked suspicious, not a request for more.
• 18:44, the deadline I asked for and he accepted: “Will this be done in 1-3 days, as you said? By Wednesday.” — “Yes”. His own stated standard was 3-7 days.
• 25 August, during the work: “he will close also all that cases”, “I also discuss about whitelisting it forever”, “customer will never face any problem in future”.

The one thing I did propose was the payment order: $1,000 now and $250 after the result, because he had refused an escrow. He agreed: “Okay you can send my commission side with second order”.

What he said after the second ban, when I asked him to honour those same terms:

• 26 Aug: “Okay price 1500 usd from now including first one” — a retroactive increase on an order already agreed and part-paid. He did not in the end apply it: the same day he wrote “You can pay for first one 250 usd but at least pay”, and the order closed at the original $1,250.
• 26 Aug: “But for all this headache I will not provide cheaper price honestly”.
• 26 Aug: “You want service with cheap price, alright then bulk order is possible”, “you don't contain reseller value for me honestly”.
• 28 Aug: “Whitelist feature 750 usd additional” — the whitelist he had called “included”.
• 3 Sep: “You are just as always talking endlessly about business and money and trying to make everything cheap”.
• 7 Sep: “Restriction removal is 2k per each case” — the cases “he will close”.
• 7 Sep: “Alex, you just ordered one profile and crying because you dont have money right now”.
• 7 Sep: “As usual, Alex want to pay so low but want to use ferrari.”

I never asked him to discount the order I had placed: I paid the $1,250 he named, in full, and asked for the things he had listed as part of that price. I did ask about rates for future bulk orders, but bulk pricing was his own offer first. Every extra dollar in this story was added by him after the failure, and every “cheap” refers to his own numbers.

How it started: the public advert, and what it promised

23 August, 13:12. I wrote to ask whether his contact also unbans ordinary accounts: “Hi bro, do you have any meta contacts for unbanning personal accounts?” At 13:27 — “Yes”, at 13:35 — “2000 usd”.

The same day, 23 August, a FAQ for that service appeared in the channel: “Q- Is it some method or software? A: No, we have contact from Meta Account Safety team. We are paying them and unbanning accounts in 3-7 days.” So he describes the mechanism publicly himself: Meta staff are paid.

Now compare the timings. The public advert: 48 hours, “%100 guaranteed”. To me in private: 3-7 days. In practice the first unban took two days and the account survived under four hours. The second unban never happened at all, across thirteen days.

On 25 August I asked why he advertises Meta services in his channels without knowing the price. The answer: “I'm not posting it on my group”. By then the posts of 17 and 23 August, both about this service, were already in that channel.

While my client's account was dead, the channel kept reporting successes. On 29 August at 11:28: “New record, unban in 30 hours”. The same day at 16:57: “Feedbacks about unban”, with screenshots of thank-you messages. In those same days I was being told my case was sitting in the moderators' queue.

On 6 September, the day before the final refusal, the channel posted: “Unban & Meta Services Added. New Unban and other Meta-related services are now available”.

So the service did exist and was advertised. What grew was something else: in the 17 August advert it was a single offer, “48 hours, 100% guaranteed”. By 31 August the price list had six items, by 7 September eleven, and almost every new line appeared after I had asked about something that was not on the list.

My impression: the service was assembled on my case, and I was its first customer

1. He did not know his own prices. On 24 August I asked what a Meta app approval costs. The answer: “I will discuss it with my contact”. A day later: “Alright I asked pricing”. When I said it was odd to advertise an offer without knowing its price, the reply was: “I asked price to my meta contact because he did for me free”. The number arrived only on 25 August: “app aproval is 750 usd he said”. The next day it was $2,000, and the explanation read like a relay of someone else's conversation: “first he said 500 now he talk about 1500”.
2. He did not know basic facts about the product he was recommending. On 26 August his “contact” advised getting Meta Verified. I replied that the interface shows a waiting list. His reaction: “Ah really”, “I didn't know that”.
3. There was no price list until the dispute started. On 23 August prices were named ad hoc, with no list. The first structured price list appeared only on 28 August, in the middle of the conflict, together with “we can add this as rule to our aggrement” and a question to me: “is everything is suit for future aggrements?”. The rules of the service were being drafted mid-job and cleared with the customer who had already paid for it.
4. The catalogue grew with my questions. Five lines on 28 August. A “final” list of six services from the manager on 31 August. Eleven on 7 September. Each new line appeared after I asked about something that was not on the list.
5. One job, four prices. Clearing the cases on posts: $500 for all of them, then “2-3k” for all of them via the moderator, then free as part of the deal, then $2,000 each. That does not read like a price list; it reads like guessing in real time what the work ought to cost.
6. He asked me about the market. On 23 August, before the deal: “Do you have so many case about unban?” To me that read as checking whether demand existed at all.
7. The rush tier was invented in the same conversation. He first agreed to 1-3 days, then a minute later added: “in future for urgent case if you want it in 1-3 days it will be additional 500 usd”.

That same channel post listed services that matched what was taking shape in my chat, with the line “So far, we've successfully unbanned 28 accounts”. I cannot verify that number and I do not claim it is false. I am describing only my impression: from the customer's side this looked like a service being invented in real time, with the bill for the experiment going to me.

Update, 7 September: the refusal, and a price list that keeps growing

4 September. Asked for news: “you will say sorry about what you said to us”. Asked again for a date: “I wasn't able to provide exact time because I don't know what you think but they don't click to button and open account… if they do, they got caught”.

7 September, 13:29. Instead of a date, a price list arrived:

• Unban Service — 1250
• Urgent Unban — 2500
• Whitelist — 1000
• Future Protection 1 Year — 2500
• Content Protection — 750
• Developer Application Approval — 2500
• Username claim — 2500
• Block an account — 3000
• Remove restrictions — 2000
• Meta Ads Manager Unban — 2500
• Meta Profile ads unban — 2500

The last five lines are new: on 31 August the list had six items. Two of them are worth reading next to his own earlier words.

“Block an account — 3000”. On 23 August, asked whether the competitors attacking my client could use the same channel, he wrote: “Meta contact can unban and whitelist but cannot ban and blacklist”. On 26 August I asked directly whether he was already running a mass-report service for taking accounts down, and got “Nope I don't do that”. Three days earlier, on 23 August, I had been the one to float the idea (“Have you considered creating a service for this?”) and he answered “I will”. Two weeks later, blocking an account is a product with a price.

“Remove restrictions — 2000”, per case. The same action was priced four different ways in three weeks:

• 23 Aug, 19:02 — “I can manually remove them by my team”, “500 usd for it also”: five hundred dollars for all the cases on the account.
• 23 Aug, 19:21 — asked whether a moderator could clear all the strikes in one click: “They can but will request at least 2-3k usd”: two to three thousand for all of them.
• 25 Aug — during the work, at no extra charge: “he will close also all that cases”, “Report them back they will solve it also”, “so I can whitelist also posts”.
• 7 Sep, 13:39 — asked what it would cost to clear the restrictions on another of my clients' accounts, specifically through the moderator: “Restriction removal is 2k per each case”. By my count that account has more than ten such posts, which would be over $20,000 — for the same kind of work he had priced at $500 for a whole account three weeks earlier, and then promised free.

He also denies the 25 August promise: “I didnt said that mod will remove we talked with you to remove them manually at that time”.

My reading. Someone who really has the access risks nothing by being paid afterwards. Refusing post-payment while quoting a price nobody would ever pay looks like a way to avoid the job without admitting there is nothing to do it with.

His position on the money and on the service:

• I listed the five points of the agreement and asked whether he refuses both the work and the refund. His answer: “Did you pay anything to second unban? no. so good luck”.
• On how long the account survived he said: “We unbanned your account, after almost 12 hours or else they got ban themselves”. The screenshots say otherwise: the unban was confirmed on 25 August at 20:43, and at 00:41 the screen already showed a suspension dated 25 August — under four hours.
• On the whitelist, which was sold as included in the price and as a “lifetime warranty”: “whiltelist for mass report was gift but I just even ordered to remove it after this kinda behaviors”. So the protection the client paid for is now described as a gift, and he says he has had it removed in response to my complaints.
• On clearing the restrictions: “About removing restriction or else we didnt promise anything”.
• Told that the case would be published: “You are free to make it public”.

The conversation ended on “find some people to scam” and “go and find someone from market”. As of that moment the client's account is permanently disabled and the money has not been returned.

1. What was offered

23 August. Asked whether he has Meta contacts for unbanning: “Yes”, $2,000, “whitelisting included to unblock”, “personal trusted contact… I met with him”.

2. The guarantee in his own words

Asked to confirm the terms “with 100% certainty”: “Refund guaranteed service it is”, “%100 guarantee for unban in 3-7 days max”; on protection and whitelist: “It is lifetime warranty”. Whitelist, by his definition, is “preventing AI based auto ban”, and for mass-report cases the guarantee is “yes”.

3. Price, deadline, payment

The first thing that put me on guard, before any work had started, was the price falling as the conversation went on. Four hours, and I had not haggled once.

• 13:35 — “2000 usd”.
• 14:23 — “I can even do it for you 1500 for multi orders in week”.
• 17:29 — “1500 usd”.
• 17:42 — “Let me make you discount for first order, we can do it for you from 1250 usd”.

Minus 37.5% in four hours and seven minutes. He tied both cuts to volume I had promised: “I can even do it for you 1500 for multi orders in week” and “If you can promise multiple orders”. Volume pricing was his own idea first. I told him so at the time: “It seems suspicious that the price has dropped so much, but let's give it a try”. His answer named his own cost base: “We pay 1000 to contact”, “Remaining is my profit from this service”.

Later the price moved the other way. On 26 August, after the account had been banned again and I complained, he raised it retroactively on an order that was already paid for: “Okay price 1500 usd from now including first one”. Meta app approval went $750 (25 August) → $2,000 (26 August) → $2,500 (31 August), and the explanation moved with it: “first he said 500 now he talk about 1500”.

Deadline: “by Wednesday” (26 August) — “Yes”. Agreed: $1,000 upfront, $250 after the result. $1,000 was sent on 23 August at 19:36 to his USDT TRC20 wallet; the balance on 27 August.

4. The promise to clear the strikes on posts

On 23 August his first answer was “User need to close all of them by clicking them after unban”; asked whether someone else could remove them, he offered “I can manually remove them by my team”, “500 usd for it also”. On 25 August, during the work: “he will close also all that cases”, “I also discuss about whitelisting it forever”, “customer will never face any problem in future”. That evening, after the unban, about the clinic's four open cases: “Report them back they will solve it also”, “so I can whitelist also posts”. Twenty-five minutes later, about the next account I sent him, he added: “So I can let my guy approve appeals”.

5. The request for the client's email and the letter from Meta

On 25 August at 15:03 Kani asked for the account owner's email: “he will reinstate it and send an email from system to get activation link”. The same night, at 00:59, that email received a message from Meta: “How was the support you received from Meta? Hi adventuring_with_kani”. Meta sends these surveys to the contact email of a support case, addressing the account that opened the case. The handle adventuring_with_kani appears only in the email itself; it is never mentioned anywhere in the correspondence. I believe it is Kani's own Instagram account, but he never confirmed that. When I showed him the email he said nothing about the handle at all: his answer was that Meta “just mixed it” and that it is not related to him.

His reply: “They just mixed it I mean meta and send auto feedback email. It is not related to me”.

6. Banned again within hours

The unban was at 20:43. At 00:41 the account was suspended again, the screen says “Suspended on August 25, 2026”. Kani's reaction in the morning: the cause was the client's connection — “User using proxy on phone?”, “Bad ip usage”, “VPN usage based bad ip pool issues” — and “Ban is not related ai or us”. In the same minutes, at 09:56: “Okay price 1500 usd from now including first one”. The price for Meta app approval went from $750 to $2,000 in one day.

An hour later he redefined the whitelist himself: “on ban wave side like ai take down profiles we still dont have access for that whitelist”. Three days earlier the whitelist was “preventing AI based auto ban”.

7. The client is always to blame

Every time something went wrong, the cause was found on the client's side, and every time it was a new one:

• 26 Aug, morning. “User using proxy on phone?”, “Bad ip usage”, “You didn't inform me that it is not actual connection it is vpn… it got problem because of weak information”. My answers (26–28 Aug): the account had already been banned five times by competitors and no moderator had ever blamed a VPN; the VPN is private, the IPs are clean (I gave a link to check), and 20 other accounts run on it without any issue.
• 26 Aug, 09:57. “Ban is not related ai or us”. Three days earlier the whitelist was “preventing AI based auto ban”.
• 27 Aug. “I unbanned account and user got ban again themselves… I'm not responsible after unban”. Then: “there is 40+ case… due to bad ip many time detected as fake account”.
• 28 Aug. A new rule after the fact: “if it got block again this time I'm not able to help, after unban only 1 time we can cover it again” — a rule announced on 28 August, after the money had been sent on 23 August. And: “after unban you cant be responsible while whitelist is not included”. To my “you said everything was included for the clinic” — “yes it is but it didnt got ban from mass report”.
• 27 Aug. The safe-usage rules the client was later blamed for breaking only arrived on 27 August at 14:08 — a day after the second ban and two days after the account went back to the client. I had asked for them in advance, on 26 August at 20:42, and got “Alright”.
• 30 Aug. “Deadline changed since user didnt inform us about screen change”. I had forwarded him Meta's permanent-disable email on 27 Aug.
• 31 Aug. “account disabled because of fake identity. It cause usually outdated app version or bad ip address”. And: “if your users always become problematic like that it is not beneficial for me”.
• 3 Sep. “Second ban probably relate with shitty VPN and I'm not responsible”. And the work is stopped because “you are just insulting”.

The first version, the VPN, appeared before he had spoken to anyone: at 10:12 he wrote himself “I didn't talk with mod yet”, and at 12:04 the “contact” confirmed exactly that same version (“Ban reason was bad ip”). Every later explanation appeared as the conversation went on, without a single document or screenshot from his side.

8. The pattern: every question becomes disrespect, every failure becomes the client's fault

Read as a whole, the conversation is not a string of separate excuses. It is one set of moves, repeated from 23 August to 7 September. Here is each of them, in his own words.

1. A question is disrespect. 26 Aug: “And if you just here to blame it is ok”, “But for all this headache I will not provide cheaper price honestly”. 3 Sep: “I will not do any shit for you from now it is enough disrespect here”. 7 Sep: “we deserve respect”, “I'm not going to accept any excuse especially when I gift unban to someone”.
2. “Don't like it, go to the market”. Instead of an answer about the method or the date: 26 Aug “You don't need to work with us if it is not suit for you”; 3 Sep “As you think that unban is easy with meta verified support do it yourself then”; 7 Sep “if there is cheap work with them I dont care”, “Go and do”.
3. Pay first, then I will fix my own failure. 26 Aug, a few hours after the second ban: “To complete that order we need to get remaining payment”, “Complete your payment first”, “Because we proved ourself”. 7 Sep: “I will not move even my finger for this case… until payment”.
4. What was promised is retroactively a “gift”, and a gift can be taken back. On 25 Aug clearing the cases and the whitelist were part of the service. 31 Aug: “I promised it as bonus”. 3 Sep: “Second unban was gift”. 7 Sep: “whiltelist for mass report was gift but I just even ordered to remove it”.
5. Changing my status to cancel the agreement. On 23 Aug $1,250 was agreed as the first-order price. 26 Aug: “you don't contain reseller value for me honestly”. 3 Sep: “I provide it to my resellers free of charge and you are not my reseller yet”. 7 Sep: “while you are not reseller I'm still giving you chance”.
6. The cause is always on the client's side. VPN, “bad IP”, “got banned themselves”, “fake identity”, “didn't inform us about the screen change”. Detailed in the section above.
7. Accusation in return. When the arguments run out, the person asking is declared the scammer. 7 Sep: “you always trying to steal something from someone”, “catch for yourself some stupid guy that you can scam easily”, “you always trying to fuck your partners”, “find some people to scam”.
8. “I have plenty of other clients”. 31 Aug: “I got another resellers who is ordering so many accounts”. 3 Sep: “you waited because I'm busy with unbanning their orders”. 7 Sep: “I have a lot of good agencies that I work already”. Not one verifiable reference to any of them in three weeks.
9. Prepayment mandatory, escrow refused. 23 Aug: “I pay upfront to them so I can't take order like that”. 26 Aug: “while I dont get payment it is same you keep money or use guarantor”. 28 Aug: “All payments are upfront”. The risk sits with the client, always.
10. The method is “company rules”. Asked directly whether it is his own moderator or a support ticket, the manager on 2 Sep: “We have company rules that we are not allowed to disclose”.
11. Denying his own messages. 25 Aug: “he will close also all that cases”. 31 Aug: “Post based cases must be solved by user”. 7 Sep: “I didnt said that mod will remove”, “we didnt promise anything”. All three lines are in this conversation.

The pattern in one sentence: the client pays upfront, asks a question, is declared disrespectful, loses part of the service as a punishment, and is told at the end that he is the scammer.

9. Threats

26 August, 10:23–10:39: “…will be activated shortly and if we don't get payment right after activation we will suspend that account again”, “After we complete case if we don't get payment, 500 usd”, “I will not just ban your customer, your main and all related other ig accounts also”. At 10:23 he promises to switch the account on and in the same breath threatens to switch it off again; at 10:29, six minutes later, he writes about that same account: “it is not our problem that user got ban again because we dont have any relation with it since we dont have access for it”. No access, yet able to ban it again.

10. The advice “use Meta Verified”

The same day the “personal Meta contact”, via Kani, advises the client to get Meta Verified. Told that Meta Verified is unavailable in the interface (“you're on the waiting list”), the answer is: “Ah really. I didn't know that”.

11. Permanently disabled

On 26 August the client filed an appeal, as Kani advised (“Appeal it, it will open directly”). On 27 August Meta replied: the account is permanently disabled (13:13 by the timestamp on the email screenshot; I forwarded it into the chat at 13:43). The same day I paid the balance — the day before, he had written: “When you confirm with payment I will complete xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx”. The account was never restored. Kani: “We needed to wait this one now we can open it”, “my guy cleaning all of them one by one”.

12. New terms after the fact

On 28 August, with the money sent on 23 August, a price list appeared: whitelist “750 usd additional”, “1 time unban free if account get ban in next 24 hours”, “all payments are upfront”. Then “unban and whitelist total 1500”. To my “everything turnkey, strikes removed, deal?”: “rules are simple, unban → 24 hours if there is ban, unban again. Whitelist also will protect account very well”. Even under these new rules the second unban was due.

13. Deadlines

On 2 September he put the free second unban in writing: “just for your information, to make you my reseller I dont bill you for second unban”. On 3 September that same free unban became the price of a refund: “If customer wants refund first they can pay for second unban”. On 7 September: “Did you pay anything to second unban? no. so good luck”.

The deadline for the second unban: “Monday” (31 August). On 30 August Kani asks for a current screenshot, sees “permanent” and writes “Perfect. That was what I need. Processing it”, then half an hour later: “Deadline changed since user didnt inform us about screen change. Probably Tuesday or Wednesday”. I had forwarded him Meta's permanent-disable email on 27 August (see above).

14. The strikes became a “bonus”

31 August: “We just unban the account. Post based cases must be solved by user”. I forwarded his own messages from 25 August. The reply: “I promised it as bonus… when there is second time unban I can't gift additional process”.

15. The password request

On 2 September Kani asked for the client's account password “to realtime check screen”. The screen had not changed since 27 August; I sent a screenshot. “We are handling that case, account will back soon”. “Today?” — “probably”.

16. Manager Yulia: the price list and “company rules”

On 31 August the Sharingtools manager sent a “final” price list: Unban 1250, Urgent 2500, Whitelist 1000, Future Protection 2500, Content Protection 750, Developer Application Approval 2500. Two days later, on 2 September, I asked her directly whether Kani works through his own moderator or through a regular Meta Verified support ticket. Her answer: the company has rules she is not allowed to disclose. That same evening Kani answered differently: “Low to high we have a lot of ranked moderators on meta team”, “Which we pay for bribe”.

17. The refusal

3 September, 11 days after payment: “Checking with mods”. On the refund: “If customer wants refund first they can pay for second unban”. When I wrote that this looks like a regular support ticket: “I'm telling to my moderator to dont run that case since you are just insulting”, “do it yourself”, “don't bother me or Yulia”, “I don't own you anything”, “Second unban was gift”, “Until Sunday you can try… If you can't I can provide you service”.

18. The advert in his channel

Meanwhile a Sharingtools post appeared in Kani's Telegram channel (it is not in the correspondence; I saw it in the channel itself): “So far, we've successfully unbanned 28 accounts”, with a list of services matching the 31 August price list: Unban, Urgent Unban, Whitelist, Future Protection, Content Protection, Developer Application Approval.

19. What I told them

So that nobody can say I kept quiet and then “suddenly” wrote a review. All of this is in the conversation, by date:

• 23 Aug. I proposed doing the first deal through an independent escrow. Refused: “I pay upfront to them”. I asked him to confirm the whitelist and the guarantee “with 100% certainty” and asked what happens if the account is banned again for no reason. I got: “refund guaranteed”, “lifetime warranty”, “about mass report based cases yes”.
• 26 Aug. After Meta's email to the client I asked him not to collect my clients' data or contact them. After the second ban: “you promised protection from AI blocks and a whitelist, the account was banned again within 12 hours”. On the VPN: private, clean IPs, 20 accounts running on it, no moderator has ever blamed a VPN. On prices: “I can't work with a partner whose prices change inexplicably every day and whose agreements aren't honoured; I've already quoted a price to my clients”. I asked what the app-approval price jump from 750 to 2,000 had to do with any of this. I suggested not guessing about the cause and waiting for the moderator's answer. I asked for full post-unban usage instructions so there would be no “you did something wrong”.
• 27 Aug. “The client paid, the account was unbanned, and less than a day later it was banned again. What exactly is unfair here?” “Everyone offering Meta unblocking services gives at least a one-month guarantee. A second ban within 10 hours is exactly the AI ban that the protection package was supposed to cover”. I paid the balance with a reservation: if this isn't resolved decently, I'll ask for a full refund. I asked what I was supposed to do if the client demanded their money back.
• 28 Aug. The clinic's account did not and cannot violate the rules: no automation, no prohibited content; my clients are white-hat businesses. My condition for further work: full guarantee, all strikes removed, turnkey. I proposed a three-way call with Yulia to fix what is and isn't included in the service. To his “no responsibility without whitelist”: “you said everything was included for the clinic, including the whitelist”.
• 31 Aug. “I told you about the permanent ban three days ago”. “Could this have happened because you didn't remove the strikes as promised?” “Will the strikes be removed as promised?” I forwarded his own messages from 25 Aug. “I'm not asking for anything supernatural, only what you promised yourself”. To Yulia: does future protection include all whitelists, strikes, the account itself, a one-year guarantee?
• 2 Sep. I refused to hand over the client's account password. I asked what the moderator says and what the deadline is. To Yulia, directly: is the method his own moderator inside Meta or a ticket through Meta Verified? If the latter, we don't need it: we've been doing that ourselves for a year, it doesn't work in complex cases.
• 3 Sep. “It looks like you're working through Meta Verified support and don't know yourself when they'll answer. A real moderator gives specific dates. What are these ‘40 security triggers’? Daily postponements”. Three points: the strikes weren't removed; the client received a support-quality email for your adventuring_with_kani account; the whole service list was invented on my case, with terms changing every day. “If what you said about the moderator is true, I take it back”. “A result or a refund by Sunday”.

Conclusion

My opinion. I do not believe there is a moderator inside Meta. I never saw a “personal contact” at work. What I did see was this: a Meta support survey sent to the client's email and addressed to his own account, the advice to get Meta Verified, and deadlines that slipped as if someone were waiting in an ordinary queue. To me that adds up to a normal support request, the kind any subscriber can file themselves for free. I saw services and prices invented on the fly, terms that changed every time I asked an uncomfortable question, written threats to ban the client's accounts and mine, and a walk-back of the guarantee he himself had promised.

The main point for anyone considering this service: ask in advance, and get it in writing, what happens if the account is banned again within hours. In my case the answer turned out to be “not our problem” and “the second unban was a gift”.

I do not recommend Kani Baspinar or Sharingtools.services for any paid Meta service, whether it is an unban, a whitelist, restriction removal, app approval or anything else on their list.